Reading further tells you that Clinton would also better McCain in the purple states. However, it is Obama who has the larger margin in be trusty stalwart blue states. (Obama ahead of McCain by 14 points, Clinton ahead of McCain by 11.)
So all together that beats down the idea that Obama's not our electable candidate. The numbers show it's he who's the one who is more electable.
I've also been following the Rasmussen poll numbers state-by-state for weeks now.
Turns out that in some of the states where Hillary brags she's won, Obama pulls stronger numbers against McCain than she does. Link shows graphic illustration.
Obama's general election advantage compared to Clinton shows in the paired Rasmussen polling against McCain in California [big, big prize], New Mexico, Nevada, New Hampshire, NJ.
Even in her own state, NY, Obama's margin is 1-point greater against McCain (O 51 - McC 38)than her own (C 50 - McC 38) in the Rasmussen polling. She can't claim an advantage against McCain even in the state she serves as a senator.
The numbers have changed some recently, where she now does better in Florida than Obama against McCain. And she has the edge in Missouri, a state that Obama won in the primaries.
The state-by-state summary is here at Rasmussen Reports.
(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. I.U. has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is I.U endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
The Nazis, Fascists and Communists were political parties before they became enemies of liberty and mass murderers.
No comments:
Post a Comment