By TOM BREEN, Associated Press Writer Tom Breen, Associated Press Writer Thu Mar 26, 9:28 am ET CHARLESTON,
W.Va. –
Want government assistance? Just say no to drugs.
Lawmakers in at least eight states want recipients of food stamps, unemployment benefits or welfare to submit to random drug testing.
The effort comes as more Americans turn to these safety nets to ride out the recession. Poverty and
civil liberties advocates fear the strategy could backfire, discouraging some people from seeking financial aid and making already desperate situations worse.
(It could backfire in an even worse way for the drug warriors and everyone else using our tax dollars to fight an endless, extremely expensive "war on drugs" which we lost years ago. Wars are expensive, even if they are already lost. In this case, especially if the war has already been lost.)
.
Those in favor of the drug tests say they are motivated out of a concern for their constituents' health and ability to put themselves on more solid financial footing once the economy rebounds.
But proponents concede they also want to send a message: you don't get something for nothing. (Yeah right, we all know how concerned these people are for their so-called constituents. That's why many of them voted for policies which led us over an economic cliff for campaign support from their real constituents, some of whom may not even be in the state they represent, not to mention their districts, but all of whom stood to get wealthier of said policies.)
"Nobody's being forced into these
assistance programs," said
Craig Blair, a Republican in the
West Virginia Legislature who has created a Web site —
notwithmytaxdollars.com — that bears a bobble-headed likeness of himself advocating this position. "If so many jobs require
random drug tests these days, why not these benefits?"
(Of course they aren't being forced into assistance programs. Neither are the crooks on Wall Street, but are they being asked to submit to the piss police?)
Blair is proposing the most comprehensive measure in the country, as it would apply to anyone
applying for food stamps,
unemployment compensation or the federal programs usually known as "welfare":
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families and Women, Infants and Children.
Lawmakers in other states are offering similar, but more modest proposals.
On Wednesday, the
Kansas House of Representatives approved a measure mandating drug testing for the 14,000 or so people getting cash assistance from the state, which now goes before the
state senate. In February, the
Oklahoma Senate unanimously passed a measure that would require drug testing as a condition of receiving TANF benefits, and similar bills have been introduced in
Missouri and
Hawaii.
A Florida senator has proposed a bill linking unemployment compensation to drug testing, and a member of
Minnesota's House of Representatives has a bill requiring drug tests of people who get public assistance under a state program there.
A January attempt in the
Arizona Senate to establish such a law failed
In the past, such efforts have been stymied by legal and cost concerns, said
Christine Nelson,
a program manager with the
National Conference of State Legislatures. But states' bigger fiscal crises, and the surging demand for public assistance, could change that.
"It's an example of where you could cut costs at the expense of a segment of society that's least able to defend themselves," said
Frank Crabtree,
executive director of the
West Virginia chapter of the
American Civil Liberties Union.
Drug testing is not the only restriction envisioned for people receiving public assistance: a bill in the Tennessee Legislature would cap lottery winnings for recipients at $600. (Perhaps they should be sterilized as well...snark. After all, kids are expensive.)
There seems to be no coordinated move around the country to push these bills, and similar proposals have arisen periodically since
federal welfare reform in the 1990s. But the appearance of a cluster of such proposals in the midst of the recession shows lawmakers are newly engaged about who is getting public assistance.
Particularly troubling to some policy analysts is the drive to
drug test people
collecting unemployment insurance, whose numbers nationwide now exceed 5.4 million, the highest total on records dating back to 1967.
"It doesn't seem like the kind of thing to bring up during a recession," said
Ron Haskins, a senior fellow at the
Brookings Institution. "People who are unemployed, who have lost their job, that's a sympathetic group. Americans are tuned into that, because they're worried they'll be next."
Indeed, these proposals are coming at a time when more Americans find themselves in need of public assistance.
Although the number of TANF recipients has stayed relatively stable at 3.8 million in the last year, claims for
unemployment benefits and
food stamps have soared.
In December, more than 31.7 million Americans were receiving
food stamp benefits, compared with 27.5 million the year before.
The link between public assistance and drug testing stems from the Congressional overhaul of welfare in the 1990s, which allowed states to implement drug testing as a condition of receiving help.
But a federal court struck down a
Michigan law that would have allowed for "random, suspicionless" testing, saying it violated the
4th Amendment's protections against
unreasonable search and seizure, said
Liz Schott, a senior fellow at
the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
At least six states —
Indiana,
Massachusetts,
Minnesota,
New Jersey,
Wisconsin and
Virginia — tie eligibility for some public assistance to drug testing for convicted felons or parolees, according to the NCSL.
Nelson said programs that screen welfare applicants by assigning them to case workers for interviews have shown some success without the need for drug tests. These alternative measures offer treatment, but can also threaten future benefits if drug problems persist, she said.
They also cost less than the
$400 or so needed for tests that can catch a sufficient range of illegal drugs, and rule out false positive results with a follow-up test, she said.
___
Associated Press Writer Lawrence Messina in
Charleston contributed to this report.
(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. I.U. has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is I.U endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
The Nazis, Fascists and Communists were political parties before they became enemies of liberty and mass murderers.
