Wednesday, December 12, 2007

Politics and The Net

We have noticed that some pols seem almost Internet averse. Same is true of the MSM, but that is certainly understandable.

There is certainly a group in the U.S. who despises the thought of information flowing to the masses, especially for free, well almost.

I read an article a few weeks ago that said that the U.S. is way behind other "first world nations" when it comes to Internet speed. Wish now that I had saved it.

Then I saw a blip somewhere about the amount of uploaded videos slowing things down. Does anyone believe that?

It does seem to us that there is already a tiering of the Net going on; an Internet caste system, of sorts.

Considering what a great, open country we think we are, we should have broadband in every household, at a very low cost, even if it has to be government subsidized.

Online Politics Offers Opportunities, Pitfalls

Smart Use of the Web Could Pay the Ultimate Dividend

One of the most fascinating aspects of the current presidential campaign will be how candidates utilize the Internet to get their messages out -- and how their strategies work for and against them.

By the time next November rolls around, I believe we'll all be amazed at how much influence the web had on individual campaigns and, quite possibly, the final outcome. Howard Dean's widely lauded use of the web in 2004 will seem as outdated as "I Like Ike" buttons when it's all said and done.

I predict the savviest candidates will use the web in these three key ways during the campaign:

  • Image Building: Without the time or space restrictions of traditional advertising, candidates will have unlimited opportunities to define who they are. Hillary Clinton's webisodes featuring husband and former President Bill Clinton are a deliberate effort to change perceptions of her as serious and calculating by positioning her as someone with a sense of humor who's in touch with the times.

  • Platform Proliferation: There's only so much a candidate can do with 15-second sound bites on the evening news. The web, with its infinite number of specialized communities, affords candidates an unprecedented opportunity to deliver specific messages to highly targeted audiences. For instance, Republicans John McCain and Mitt Romney, as well as Democrats Barack Obama and John Edwards, have shared their thoughts with influential technology blogger Mike Arrington, ruminating on such issues as broadband access and taxing the Internet.

  • Mobilizing the Masses: Ironically, the greatest impact the web may have on this election is fostering a return to old-fashioned politics. Remember the old block captains of yesteryear, who would literally go door-to-door in their neighborhoods stumping for candidates and dragging reluctant voters to the polls? The Internet is the most powerful word-of-mouth tool ever, and smart campaigners will effectively use that power to tap key opinion influencers who can get out the vote.
Interestingly, one of the greatest advantages of the Internet -- the ability to create true two-way dialogue -- could also prove to be its greatest danger. In this age of scripted town-hall meetings and carefully orchestrated media "availabilities," candidates may not be prepared for the withering scrutiny such open forums can invite.

Ultimately, I believe the most successful candidates will be the ones who embrace this interaction -- participating in online chats, conducting "no-holds-barred" exchanges with bloggers, even allowing unfiltered commentary on the their own websites. In the still-unproven world of online politics it's a giant leap of faith ... but one that could pay the ultimate dividend.

~ ~ ~
A former chairman of the South Carolina Democratic Party, Joe Erwin is president of Erwin-Penland, a 180-person full-service advertising and marketing agency in Greenville, S.C., that is part of Interpublic Group of Cos.' Hill Holliday Connors Cosmopulos.

1 Comment

You are correct, there is unlimited potential. But, the campaigns still aren't listening; they aren't changing their ways.

Political campaigns too often look at technology as the solution to their problems. But, it's not about the technology. When it comes to communicating with an ever-evolving audience, today's political campaigns and organizations have more than enough tools to get the job done -- blogs, podcasts, social networks, and much more. Yet they are still struggling to stay focused and execute their ideas, find a connection, and increase interest and participation in the political system. Instead of focusing on the technology, political campaigns must focus on making more and better information and experiences available to their audience, not creating more interesting ways for them to get that product.

I believe that as long as organizations focus either on the distribution mechanism – as the political industry seems to always do - they're missing a core element, which is that information and experience that audiences value. If, or when, the campaigns and candidates focus on creating more thoughtful, engaging, informative, relevant information and experiences, voters and citizens will re-engage.

Brian Reich

p.s. I wrote a book about this -- Media Rules!: Mastering Today's Technology to Connect With and Keep Your Audience (Wiley & Sons 2008). –Brian Reich, Cambridge, MA

(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. I.U. has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is I.U endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)

The Nazis, Fascists and Communists were political parties before they became enemies of liberty and mass murderers.

No comments: