Showing posts with label brain health. Show all posts
Showing posts with label brain health. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

Iraq War Vets and Concussions and TBIs

What we have always called "closed head injury" which, apparently has been renamed as TBI, has been one of the most undiagnosed conditions in civilian, as well as military, life for years.

Often found in cases of whiplash from auto accidents when the driver or passenger is hit from behind, TBIs often go undianosed. While connected to the spine and spinal column, the brain floats in a sea of spinal fluid. When the head is thrown forward and back, violently, the pre-frontal lobes can smash into the front of the skull, which has protrusions, like stubby little fingers, except these protrusions are all bone. This can really do a number on the brain's normal executive function.

When someone presents at a hospital with signs and symptoms of concussion, the main concern is the development of a sub-dural hematoma; in other words a big bruise. Of course a big bruise is no big deal if it is found on a person's arm, leg or any other part of the anatomy after an accident of some kind. However, there is only so much room inside the skull, so a large mass of dried blood or bleeeding of the brain inside the skull is a critical condition, relieved by drilling a hole in the skull to relieve the pressure on the brain.

So, if there is no open wound or subdural, patients are discharged from the hospital E.R with warnings to the family to check their loved one every 45 minutes or so, and they are told what to look for, like uneven dilation of pupils and the like. If such symptoms are observed, the patient should be brought back to the hospital, STAT.

TBIs can cause problems for a person for years, or maybe for life. Nevertheless, the human brain is quite remarkable and can often, if given time, regain at least some if the lost function.

Not much can be done, medically. Helping the patient learn how to cope with less brain function is about the only thing that can be done. Neurofeedback is sometimes quite helpful in cases of closed head injury.


August 26, 2008


Former Staff Sgt. Kevin Owsley is not quite sure what rattled his brain in 2004: the roadside bomb that exploded about a yard from his Humvee or the rocket-propelled grenade that flung him across a road as he walked to a Porta Potti on base six weeks later.


After each attack, he did what so many soldiers do in Iraq. He shrugged off his ailments — headaches, dizzy spells, persistent ringing in his ears and numbness in his right arm — chalking them up to fatigue or dehydration. Given that he never lost consciousness, he figured the discomfort would work itself out and kept it to himself.


“You keep doing your job with your injuries,” said Mr. Owsley, 47, an Indiana reservist who served as a gunner for a year outside Baghdad beginning in March 2004. “You don’t think about it.”


But more than three years after coming home, Mr. Owsley’s days have been irrevocably changed by the explosions. He struggles to unscramble his memory and thoughts. He often gets lost on the road, even with directions. He writes all his appointments down but still forgets a few. He wears a hearing aid, cannot bear sunlight on his eyes, still succumbs to nightmares and considers four hours of sleep a night a gift.


Mr. Owsley is part of a growing tide of combat veterans who come home from Iraq and Afghanistan with mild traumatic brain injuries, or concussions, caused by powerful explosions. As many as 300,000, or 20 percent, of combat veterans who regularly worked outside the wire, away from bases, have suffered at least one concussion, according to the latest Pentagon estimates. About half the soldiers get better within hours, days or several months and require little if any medical assistance. But tens of thousands of others have longer-term problems that can include, to varying degrees, persistent memory loss, headaches, mood swings, dizziness, hearing problems and light sensitivity.


These symptoms, which may be subtle and may not surface for weeks or months after their return, are often debilitating enough to hobble lives and livelihoods.


To this day, some veterans — it is impossible to know how many — remain unscreened, their symptoms undiagnosed. Mild brain injury was widely overlooked by the military and the veterans health system until recently.


Even now, with traumatic brain injury called the signature injury of the Iraq war, some soldiers and their advocates say that complications from mild concussions often are not recognized.


Mr. Owsley’s request for a Purple Heart, given to troops wounded or killed in action, was denied by the military, a devastating blow. Others say that their mild brain injury entitled them only to low disability payments, or, if the diagnosis was inconclusive, to none at all.


This has happened in large part because there is no quantifiable diagnostic test for the injury, and the language used by the Veterans Affairs Department to rate traumatic brain injury, or T.B.I., is vague. The military, in particular, seldom rates each symptom from a concussion separately, which it is required to do, said Kerry Baker, associate national legislative director for Disabled American Veterans.


“The criteria remains ambiguous,” Mr. Baker said. “The military way underrates T.B.I. and its symptoms.”


Scant Medical Knowledge


Little is known medically by doctors or scientists about what happens to a brain as a result of a powerful bomb blast, as opposed to car crashes on a highway, blows to the head on a football field or a bullet wound. These are the first wars in which soldiers, protected by strong armor and rapid medical care, routinely survive explosions at close range and then return to combat.


The bomb blasts, which throw off energy waves — atmospheric overpressures and underpressures — that are absorbed by the body, add a little-studied dimension to the trauma. Scientists are only now beginning to study the extent of the damage.


That soldiers are sometimes exposed to multiple blasts during a deployment, or can suffer from a vast combination of wounds, including shrapnel, burns, blows to the head, blast waves, lost limbs or internal injuries, can exacerbate brain trauma in ways unseen among civilians. “It is the black box of injuries,” said Dr. Alisa D. Gean, the chief of neuroradiology at San Francisco General Hospital and a traumatic brain injury expert who spent time treating soldiers at Landstuhl Regional Medical Center in Germany. “We’re at the tip of the iceberg of understanding it. It is one of the most complicated injuries to one of the most complicated parts of the body.”


These mild concussions, which do not necessarily lead to loss of consciousness, are easy to dismiss, simple to misdiagnose and difficult to detect. The injured soldiers can walk and talk. Their heads usually show no obvious signs of trauma. CT scans cannot see the injuries. And the symptoms often mirror those found in post-traumatic stress disorder, making it hard to distinguish between them. In fact, the two ailments often go hand in hand.


Gee, what a surprise!


But the consequences of these seemingly small concussions can be far-reaching, leading to financial problems, job losses, divorce and mental health issues. The ramifications often go unseen by the military because symptoms often worsen once veterans leave the structure of the Army or Marine Corps for the unpredictability of civilian life.


Take the case of Mr. Owsley, a father of three, whose brain injury so impaired his reaction time and memory that doctors advised him not to work.


“I almost lost everything,” said Mr. Owsley, whose wife brought home the family paycheck for two years, working at a nursing home. “We were at the point of getting ready to lose the house and the cars. Then you start planning out things. I was planning to do suicide and make it look like an accident so my family would get the insurance.”


At first, he said, doctors missed his traumatic brain injury. “She told me nothing was wrong with me, but she gave me like 18 different medications, for pain, to go to sleep, for lots of other things,” he said of his first visit to a Veterans Affairs doctor at a facility in Fort Wayne, Ind.


Later that year, another veterans hospital said he had mild traumatic brain injury, post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, hearing loss and injuries to his hand, ankles, eye and back. He was rated 100 percent disabled by the Veterans Affairs Department and now receives a monthly check for $2,711, easing the financial pressure somewhat.


Yet Mr. Owsley, referring to his Purple Heart denial letter, said he felt his injuries had gone unrecognized by the military “because there was no blood” and because he chose to work through his pain.


“They said it was because I didn’t report it in the field and seek medical attention at the time, and there was no proof” of any obvious injury, Mr. Owsley said. “I had guys write statements for me to prove it had happened. As a soldier with 23 years in the Army, them badges mean more than anything. When you get injured, you should be recognized, even if you don’t see it over there.”


Has anyone thought of brain imaging, as a diagnostic tool? What about a Pet scan? Probably too expensive.


It was not until 2006, three years into the Iraq war, that the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs began to pay close attention to mild traumatic brain injuries. The Pentagon last year opened the Defense Centers of Excellence for Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain Injury, a clearinghouse for treatment, training, prevention, research and education. This year it is spending a record $300 million on research for traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress disorder.


“We are more attuned to brain injuries now,” said Lt. Col. Michael Jaffee, the director of the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center. “There has not been as aggressive an effort before.”


That effort begins with screening. As of May, service members who deploy longer than 30 days will undergo neurocognitive testing before leaving, to establish a baseline for changes that may occur later, and again upon returning. At the same time, soldiers in battle who lose consciousness or feel dazed after a blast or other event must be screened by a medical provider and are either approved for duty in the field, told to rest for several days on base or sent to Landstuhl for further evaluation.


Last year, Veterans Affairs started screening all Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans who come in for clinical help. So far, 33,000 of 227,015, about 15 percent, have screened positive for mild brain injury since April 2007.


It is unclear how many service members, particularly those who fought earlier in the war, remain unscreened and whose injuries go undiagnosed.


“No doubt that there are significant numbers out there,” said Dr. Barbara Sigford, director of physical medicine and rehabilitation for the Department of Veterans Affairs.


Bryan Lane, 31, a former sergeant first class in Special Forces, did not zero in on his head injury until more than a year after a bomb exploded next to him in a house in Baghdad in 2005. The reasons were understandable. He lost a huge chunk of his right arm in the explosion and was fortunate not to have lost the limb altogether.


He did not realize that his brain had taken a hit until five months later, when he saw the gaping hole in the front of his helmet. He never lost consciousness after the blast, but the soldier next to him was knocked out for two hours.


The possibility that he might have suffered a concussion was never mentioned during his many months at Womack Army Medical Center in Fort Bragg, N.C., where he had several operations to save his arm. Six months after he was medically discharged, when he was putting in a Veterans Affairs disability claim for his arm injury, a V.A. doctor brought up a possibility overlooked at Womack: he might still be suffering symptoms from a concussion.


It explained his shortened attention span, his frequent search for the right word during conversation and his forgetfulness. “I hear things, but it doesn’t throw it in the memory box,” he said.


These symptoms can also be found in PTSD patients; either in people who have been subjected to one acute stressor or long-term, continuing stress. Acute or long-term, unremitting stress can cause the hippocampus to literally shrink. This is the brain structure that is responsible for memory storage. It decides whether the information is significant enough to be stored long term, or tossed out, after a period of time.


There may also be an inability to concentrate, like that found in some attention deficit disorders. If one cannot concentrate all that well, it is unlikely that information will even paid attention, let alone be stored for future use.


“I was completely honest and said I don’t think I have T.B.I.,” said Mr. Lane, who is still articulate, though less so today, he said. “A lot of guys, myself included, fight the label of T.B.I. no matter how mild. In a way, it’s like people are calling you stupid or retarded, and I know that’s not P.C.”


The Veterans Affairs Department, which has become increasingly vigilant about mild traumatic brain injury, thought otherwise and did something unusual. It attached a brain injury claim alongside one for post-traumatic stress disorder, covering all bases. “Since no one understands the relation they have to each other, they said, ‘If you have one, you have the other,’ ” said Mr. Lane, who receives benefits for mental and physical injuries. He now works for the Armed Forces Foundation, a nonprofit group that provides troops, many of them injured, with financial support, among other things.


Delayed Symptoms Explained


Post-traumatic stress disorder and traumatic brain injury are closely tied, although the precise relationship between the two is unknown.


This connection was most recently established in a study in The New England Journal of Medicine in January by Col. Charles W. Hoge, an Army psychiatrist who is leading efforts to identify mental health problems among combat troops. His survey of 2,500 Army infantry soldiers found that more than 40 percent of those who reported loss of consciousness also met the criteria for post-traumatic stress disorder. That was a much higher percentage than those who had suffered other injuries, like Humvee accidents or falls.


Dr. Hoge cautioned, though, that some symptoms — anger, headaches, depression, sleeplessness, mood swings — may stem solely from combat stress, a psychiatric disorder, and not traumatic brain injury. Combat, he emphasized, often goes hand in hand with traumatic experiences, including a near loss of life or the death or injury of others.


For years most troops with mild concussions stayed on the job, immersing themselves in combat again and re-exposing themselves to additional blasts with little or no time to rest and recover. This pattern only heightened the risk of brain injury and post-traumatic stress disorder, doctors say.


Civilians with brain injury, on the other hand, are given time to recuperate for long periods in a safe environment, which may explain why they respond differently to stress.


Dr. Ibolja Cernak, a brain injury expert who is medical director of the applied physics laboratory at Johns Hopkins University and is conducting research into blast injuries, said she had noted other differences between blast-injured soldiers and mildly brain-injured civilians. Soldiers, she said, can develop symptoms two years after a blast. Some also have greater difficulty walking or talking, or with aggression.


“Civilians don’t have the frequency of these symptoms,” Dr. Cernak said. There is no cure for those with prolonged concussion symptoms, only methods to help them learn to adapt.


Sgt. Tony Wood, 41, now based at Schofield Barracks in Hawaii, keeps a large color-coded board by the door with reminders about his appointments, his chores and his belongings, all part of the Brain Injury Recovery Kit he received from a nonprofit group called the 10 in 10 Project. His wife calls him all day with reminders, and after losing his keys countless times, he attaches them to his pants. Notebooks fill his pockets.


In his view, the military is still failing to grasp the depths of his injury, and those of other soldiers like him.


In July 2005, Sergeant Wood’s Humvee hit a roadside bomb cemented into the curb. The blast set off a chain reaction, triggering two American fragmentation grenades inside the Humvee along with an antitank weapon and countless rounds of ammunition. The two other soldiers riding with him died in the blast. The explosion tore through Sergeant Wood’s arm and abdomen and then ricocheted inside his body, leaving only his heart untouched. His liver had a fist-size hole, he lost his spleen and part of his stomach, and he sustained damage to his lungs and diaphragm.


Sergeant Wood’s first memory after the bomb was opening his eyes at Walter Reed Army Medical Center about a month later, seeing his wife, and asking, “Why are you in Iraq?”


Doctors patched up most of his physical wounds over five months. But his wife, who was born with mild brain injuries, noticed that Sergeant Wood, a military policeman, was not himself mentally. He did not remember someone who had just walked out of the room. He forgot questions he had just asked. He struggled to read one chapter of a book.


Still a Soldier, and Struggling


While he was at Walter Reed in December 2005, Sergeant Wood said doctors gave him a brain injury test. But it was inconclusive. “They tried to say I had A.D.D., I needed a good night’s sleep, you name it,” he said, referring to attention deficit disorder.


As he recovered in the Warrior Transition Unit at Tripler Army Medical Center in Hawaii, Sergeant Wood tried to decide whether to stay in the military by switching to less taxing jobs, an idea he hated, or to leave, collect his benefits and find a civilian job. But his previous jobs — professional cowboy, scuba instructor, construction worker — were out of the question.


“My T.B.I. has impacted my ability to get a good job,” he said, adding that he fears the best position he can get now is as “a greeter at Wal-Mart.”


With four foster children, two biological children and a wife, he steered the safe course and applied to try to stay in the military. The Army Medical Board deemed him unfit for active duty and sent him to the Physical Evaluation Board for a disability rating that would determine his benefits package once discharged from the Army.


When he saw his rating in March, he was floored. Despite his extensive wounds — brain injury, constant pain, failing hips, headaches, noise sensitivity, no spleen, lung damage, liver damage, panic attacks and chronic esophagitis — he received only a 50 percent rating. His brain injury made up 10 percent of the total. A memorandum from the board said that his “stated difficulties are more consistent” with post-traumatic stress disorder.


As a last resort, Sergeant Wood can turn to the federal courts. (He said he had not made that decision yet.)


He is not the first soldier to receive a low rating for his injuries from the Army since the Iraq war began. The ratings so distressed Congress that as of January, it ordered the military to follow solely the ratings schedule issued by the Veterans Affairs Department, which consistently grants veterans more money for the same injuries.


“The Army was raking these guys over the coals,” said Mr. Baker, of Disabled American Veterans.


Asked by The New York Times to review Sergeant Wood’s paperwork, Mr. Baker said his extensive injuries easily should have been rated 100 percent, according to the Veterans Affairs schedule. “This was completely wrong,” Mr. Baker added.


Sergeant Wood has stayed in the Army under a program for soldiers injured in combat. He sits at a Hawaiian jail and alerts the military when a soldier gets locked up. He fears he will get an even lower rating the next time he goes before the Army Medical Board, simply because he is doing his job well.


“You are still treated like you are trying to beat the government out of money,” Sergeant Wood said. “It’s not like I fell off a barstool.”


....and even if he had, it would be totally understandable. Welcome to the world of civilians attempting to receive disability because of closed head-injuries.


copyright 2008 The New York Times Company


(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. I.U. has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is I.U endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)



The Nazis, Fascists and Communists were political parties before they became enemies of liberty and mass murderers.


Sunday, December 9, 2007

Presidential Brain Function: Should we Know Before Pull The Lever

The following is from an email I received from a colleague this week. It brought to mind arguments and conversations I have had with friends, family and colleagues for several years. I am in full agreement with Dr Amen on the topic of presidential brain health or the lack thereof and not only our right to know about a candidate's brain health, as we have a right to know about his/her physical health, but our duty, as citizens, to demand such knowledge, for the very reasons that Daniel points out.

I've learned a few things in my discussions with numerous people on this subject:

People who have a low level of education or tend to be right-wing and/or who show signs of pathology, themselves, tend to have no use for psychiatrists/psychologists and "don't believe in psychiatry/psychology," whatever that means.

People with a high education level or tend to be to the left of center or moderate, politically do "believe in psychiatry," and/or have either seen a mental health professional at some time in their lives or knows someone who has.

When I have put forward the notion that presidential candidates and vice presidential candidates, for that matter, should have to take a full battery of psychological tests and have every type of brain imaging that we know is diagnostic or gives us a picture of the brain from which we can actually draw conclusions about the brain-function of the candidate, right-wingers usually run, screaming from such an idea. Some will hang around to argue that psychology is not a science and cannot be relied upon in such a way; as in deciding about something as important as electing a president.

I find that a jaw dropping argument, but that's just me. Everyone has a right to his/her opinion. But I can't help but find it highly interesting, if not amusing, that the very people who have, for years, diagnosed, mostly without a license to do so, an entire group of people (liberals) as loony, crazy, psychotic, etc. either don't believe in psychiatry or psychology or don't believe that candidates for president should be tested for mental health or the lack thereof.

People who do "believe in psychiatry/psychology" agree that we should and could find a way to test candidates that is exploitation-proof. They also believe it would be like trying to move a mountain to make candidates submit to mental health exams just as they do physical health exams and I'm afraid I have to agree with them on that point.

After all, while people who flip burgers and work in convenience stores must submit to the "piss police" in order to be employed, we, the people, have not a clue what types of drugs, if any, the top two officials in our government are taking. Does that make sense to anyone?

As we know, the president and this vice president are very powerful people. They could quite literally destroy the world or make large parts of it uninhabitable in less than an hour. They could declare martial law and suspend the constitution for years, should they feel threatened by the people for any reason, like with impeachment for example, and I, for one, have not seen anyone in Washington willing and with the courage to stop such an act.

Actually, I began thinking about this subject during the Clinton administration. I, and most of my friends, knew that Clinton had had a problem with womanizing. Who didn't know? What everyone who voted for him should have known was that under great and/or prolonged stress he might well return to it. What none of us could have possibly known was that the man was going to be investigated constantly from day one; that he would have the constant stress of one congressional investigation on top of another and a special prosecutor dogging his every step. The Clintons were the most investigated couple in American history, with the possible exception of the Rosenbergs and that is stress, whether one is guilty of anything or not. Add to the stress of being investigated for what amounted to nothing all those years, the normal stress of being the President of the United States and we have a situation which would almost surely have led to a relapse into his favorite "coping mechanism" and a character defect he had struggled with for years and one about which we all knew, unless we were living in a cave during the 1992 election..

I have always wondered why anyone was surprised that Clinton slipped back into his old ways?

The main problem with all of that was that it distracted the country from something far more important: Osama bin Laden. This was a man with $ millions who had bombed our embassies, our ship and declared war on the U.S., but many, many Americans had not a clue who the hell he was on the morning of 9/11/01. Why? Because the news media, in particular, and the press was fixated on Clinton's sex life. It all seems so childish and silly now, doesn't it?

After the last nearly two Bush administrations, anyone who isn't concerned about the mental health of our two top leaders either hasn't been paying attention or is as whacko as the Neocons, themselves, also known as the "effing crazies." (Just ask Colin Powell)

It doesn't take a professional to see that there is something seriously wrong with George W Bush and Dick Cheney. Nevertheless, the mental health professionals in this country and other countries have probably been the most alarmed for the longest period of time.

It is time to seriously discuss the importance of the degree of brain health in our leaders and our right to know before we exercise our duty to vote.

If there is anything we all should have learned in these last years it is that we can not afford, as a nation, to have leaders who with questionable mental health, not to mention psychopathology recognizable for miles.

GETTING INSIDE THEIR HEADS

By Daniel G. Amen MD
LA TIMES Op-Ed
December 5, 2007

What do Rudy Giuliani’s messy personal life, John McCain’s temper and Hillary Clinton’s inability to seem authentic have in common? Maybe nothing. They just may be overblown issues in the otherwise normal lives of candidates under the political microscope. Such symptoms, however, may mean a lot — such as evidence of underlying brain dysfunction. Sometimes people with messy personal lives have low prefrontal cortex activity associated with poor judgment; sometimes people with temper problems have brain damage and impulse control problems; sometimes people who struggle with authenticity have trouble really seeing things from someone else’s perspective.

Is the brain health of a presidential candidate a fair topic in an election year? Certainly Dick Cheney’s heart condition wasn’t off-limits in 2000, nor have questions about McCain’s age been considered out of bounds. The White House issues a complete medical history of the president each year — detailing everything from his seasonal allergic rhinitis to his adenomatous colon polyps. Clearly we care about the health outlook for our elected leaders. Should we go so far as to do brain scans? Of candidates for the Oval Office? Some people might consider discussing brain health a ridiculous idea. Not me.

As a neuropsychiatrist and brain-imaging expert, I want our elected leaders to be some of the “brain healthiest people” in the land. How do you know about the brain health of a presidential candidate unless you look? The brain is involved in everything humans do: how we think, how we feel, how we get along with others, how we negotiate, how we pay attention in meetings and how we turn away the advances of White House interns or decide to invade a country based on contradictory intelligence.

Three of the last four presidents have shown clear brain pathology. President Reagan’s Alzheimer’s disease was evident during his second term in office. Nonelected people were covering up his forgetfulness and directing the country’s business. Few people knew it, but we had a national crisis. Brain studies have been shown to predict Alzheimer’s five to nine years before people have their first symptoms.

President Clinton’s moral lapses and problems with bad judgment and excitement-seeking behavior — indicative of problems in the prefrontal cortex — eventually led to his impeachment and a poisonous political divisiveness in the U.S. The prefrontal cortex houses the brain’s supervisor, involved with conscience, forethought, planning, attention span and judgment.

One could argue that our current president’s struggles with language and emotional rigidity are symptoms of temporal lobe pathology. The temporal lobes, underneath your temples and behind your eyes, are involved with language, mood stability, reading social cues and emotional flexibility.

A national leader with brain problems can potentially cost millions of people their lives. Slobodan Milosevic and Saddam Hussein give us recent historical examples. Both of Milosevic’s parents committed suicide, he had serious bouts of depression and reportedly drank heavily — all signs that point to brain problems. He was found to be unreasonable and unreliable in negotiations and heartless as a political leader. Hussein was described as paranoid and without empathy, also symptoms pointing to poor brain function. His mother suffered severe bouts of depression and attempted suicide while pregnant with him, which is known to affect a baby’s developing brain. He was physically and emotionally abused by his stepfather. All of these stresses must have been involved in shaping his paranoid brain into a mind that could torture dissenters, murder relatives and launch chemical attacks that killed thousands.

Functional scans, such as Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography, provide a window into the brain. Doctors can now see healthy or dysfunctional brain patterns, much as we can assess the strength of a heart or measure hormone levels, and recognize trouble. All doctors might not agree on the interpretation, but there is a growing body of scientific literature establishing what these scans mean, such as a Attention Deficit Disorder or a predisposition for Alzheimer’s.

Ensuring that our president has a healthy brain may be more than an interesting topic of conversation. It can be important information to put into the election equation. A president with brain problems could wreak havoc on the U.S. and the world at large. Maybe we shouldn’t leave the health of our president’s brain to chance. We have the tools, shouldn’t we look?



(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. I.U. has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is I.U endorsed or sponsored by the originator.) The Nazis, Fascists and Communists were political parties before they became enemies of liberty and mass murderers.