Showing posts with label Dissent. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dissent. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 17, 2007

If there Ever Is A War....

that is "internationally and constitutionally legal and "morally just" in which the U.S. finds it must fight, every family must contribute both blood and money, including the sons and daughters of everyone on the Hill and in the White House, as well as from families from every socio-economic class

Dissent from the Front Lines

by Robert Scheer

When will we listen to the troops? I’m not talking about soldiers used as props for a George Bush photo op, telling reporters what Washington wants to hear. The military is disciplined and thus accustomed, from Gen. David Petraeus on down, to toeing the official line. But the Iraq war has also produced brilliant messages of dissent from the ranks that should cause us to stop in our tracks and reconsider what we have wrought. First, a group of sergeants came forward, and on Tuesday it was the captains’ turn to speak out.

In “The War as We Saw It,” an eloquent Op-Ed article published in The New York Times in August, seven sergeants summarized the futility of their 15 months of fighting in Iraq: “To believe that Americans, with an occupying force that long ago outlived its reluctant welcome, can win over a recalcitrant local population and win this counterinsurgency is farfetched.” After penning that crie de cour, two of the soldiers died in Iraq and a third was severely wounded.

On Tuesday, The Washington Post printed “The Real Iraq We Knew,” by 12 former Army captains, all of whom served in Iraq. It begins: “Today marks five years since the authorization of military force in Iraq, setting Operation Iraqi Freedom in motion. Five years on, the Iraq war is as undermanned and under-resourced as it was from the start. And, five years on Iraq is in shambles. As Army captains who served in Baghdad and beyond, we’ve seen the corruption and the sectarian division. We understand what it’s like to be stretched too thin. And we know when it’s time to get out.”

How come those brave veterans know it’s time to get out, but leading Democrats, who voted for the war to be authorized, are still pussyfooting about quickly removing the troops from this ever-deepening quagmire? They’re jockeying for political advantage, knowing that drawing out the war hurts the Republicans. It is a deeply cynical ploy that works only because with our all-volunteer military, most Americans don’t have to face the choice of sacrificing themselves or their loved ones in a futile and losing war.

Yes, it costs the taxpayers, but so do the “Halo 3″ video games they are purchasing in record numbers, and for most Americans, Iraq is a make-believe war. Even the cost seems unreal, as Bush is the first president in U.S. history to cut taxes in a time of war, with the result that more than a trillion dollars in long-term obligations will not come due while his administration has to foot the bills.

If there was a draft, people would be in the streets demanding an end to this carnage, which now threatens to go on for decades. That is precisely what the neocon ideologues who got us into this mess built their fantasies on: a volunteer force, supplemented by hundreds of thousands of contractors (including 50,000 mercenary troops like those from Blackwater) and the purchase of largely irrelevant but highly profitable high-tech weaponry, although they forgot about simple armor for the troops.

The most fraudulent neocon claim was that pro-Western, even pro-Israel Iraqis, like their favorite, the now totally discredited Ahmed Chalabi, would police the country as surrogates for the U.S., and that Iraqi oil sales would pay for it all. The 12 captains, who worked with the locals, are very clear as to the forlorn outcome of that plan: ” … many of us witnessed the exploitation of U.S. tax dollars by Iraqi officials and military officers. Sabotage and graft have had a particularly deleterious impact on Iraq’s oil industry which still fails to produce the revenue that Pentagon war planners hoped would pay for Iraq’s reconstruction.”

As for that other ongoing illusion-that we are turning power over to Iraqi forces we have trained-the captains write: “Iraqi soldiers quit at will. The police are effectively controlled by militias. And … corruption is debilitating. U.S. tax dollars enrich self-serving generals and support the very elements that will battle each other after we’re gone.”

Building an empire on the cheap and by proxy doesn’t work. If you want one, and of course most of us don’t, since only a few fat cats benefit from such imperial adventures, you need a vast conscript army.

As the captains put it: “There is only one way we might be able to succeed in Iraq. To continue an operation of this intensity and duration, we would have to abandon our volunteer military for compulsory service. Short of that, our best option is to leave Iraq immediately.” Enough said.

Robert Scheer is editor of Truthdig.com and a regular columnist for The San Francisco Chronicle.

© 2007 TruthDig.com



(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. I.U. has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is I.U endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)


The Nazis, Fascists and Communists were political parties before they became enemies of liberty and mass murderers.

Monday, September 17, 2007

Gooper Brownshirt Tactics On Dissent

I can't believe that Move On didn't know they were gonna get hit hard for this ad. Anyone who has watched the GOP over the last 6 years would certainly know that the reaction from the Right would be over-the-top.

However, I don't see the American people being swayed by the opinions expressed on Cabal News so much anymore.

The Republican Brown-Shirts Are at it Again

A. Alexander, September 16th, 2007
The Republican Brown-Shirts are at it again. They're being oh-so-Nazi-like in their attack on an American group that has dared to exercise its right to dissent (John McCain says they should be thrown out of the country .. Nazi, much?). This time the Republican Jackboots are assailing MoveOn.Org, for articulating something that a recent poll found a majority of Americans believe to be the case, i.e. General Petraeus would, during Congressional testimony, willfully misrepresent and manipulate the facts and data regarding Iraq.

The Republican Brown-Shirt Brigade is attacking MoveOn even though they know that Petraeus has a history of being both a known Bush-backer and, when it comes to the situation in Iraq, a proven manipulator of reality. Should anyone not believe the above stated facts, just read the General's Washington Post op-ed published on September 26, 2004; Page B07 and titled, "Battling for Iraq."

Does any of this sound familiar ... like recently before Congress, familiar? In 2004, three years ago, Petraeus claimed, "18 months after entering Iraq, I see tangible progress," and he insisted, "Iraqi leaders are stepping forward, leading their country." Petraeus's biggest 2004 lie: "Today approximately 164,000 Iraqi police and soldiers (of which about 100,000 are trained and equipped) are performing a wide variety of security missions."

Really? There were, in 2004, "100,000 Iraqi police and soldiers trained and equipped"? There may not even be that many Iraqi police and soldiers trained and equipped in 2007 ... there certainly weren't that many in 2004. Sure, the 'Loyal Bushies' and their lapdog Generals, Petraeus included, liked to make such claims, but every assessment had proven them liars.

Still, despite Petraeus's track record of lies, manipulations, and a willingness to prostrate himself before Bush and for Bush's benefit, the Republican Brown-Shirts are attacking MoveOn. And, of course, America's corporate-owned media goes along with the absurdity. The media never once point out Petraeus's history of dishonesty, dishonor or, getting down to the real issue, his dream of running for president as a Republican.

On some level the GOP's Jackboots do want to defend Petraeus's "integrity," such as it is (no doubt it is fully inline with the 'integrity' of a party of perverts and corrupted politicians) but mostly they really hope to bully the media into being too afraid -- using the New York Times as the example -- to allow dissenting voices access to their pages and airwaves. Ultimately, intimidation is the real objective of the Republican Brown-Shirts. MoveOn's truthful Petraues portrayal is simply one more excuse for the Republicans' oh-so-Nazi-like Shock Troops to try and intimidate dissent into submission.

The tactics that are being employed by today's Republicans are not a little like the tactics employed by Hitler's Brown-Shirts, their tactics of trying to intimidate dissent into silence are EXACTLY the tactics that Hitler's henchman employed. America's feckless corporate-owned media, New York Times included, will cower to these attacks ... MoveOn and other Progressive organizations must not! They must hit back and, too, begin to expose the Republican tactics for what they are ... an oh-so-Nazi-like attempt by Republican Brown-Shirts to stifle dissent.


(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. I.U. has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is I.U endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)

The Nazis, Fascists and Communists were political parties before they became enemies of liberty and mass murderers.

Friday, September 7, 2007

An Open Letter To America

An Open Letter to America: All Power to the People

by Rev. Lennox Yearwood, Jr.

On July 1, 2007 I sought the support of regular Americans after receiving notification from the U.S. Air Force Reserve that they were threatening to discharge me on the basis of behavior that, in their words, is “clearly inconsistent with the interest of national security.” The behavior in question is my outspoken opposition to the occupation of Iraq and the inadequate and inhuman response to the tragedy of Katrina.

As a result of the outpouring of support I received from all over the United States and from around the world, the Air Force backed down. Thanks to my brothers and sisters in the movement, I will end my service with the honorable discharge that I earned. I am eternally grateful, and evermore committed to taking on the powers that be for the powers that ought to be.

At first, when I informed the Air Force that I would fight their harassment, they threatened me with deployment to Iraq, or even prison time. Then with the tremendous circulation and widespread publishing of my first Open Letter, the Air Force realized if they were going to challenge me, they would have to challenge thousands of Americans from across the nation outside of Robbins Air Force Base in Georgia, on my hearing date.

Even now, after all the pain we have been through as a nation these last years, the reaction of the Air Force shows that when we are organized in the face of a government that does not represent us, we the people have the power.

Mine is the third case in which the military has backed down when the people have challenged their attempts to silence dissent. When former Sgt. Adam Kokesh spoke out after risking his life in Fallujah, Iraq, the U.S. Marines threatened him with a “less than honorable” discharge but backed down after many came out in support of Adam. When Marine Sgt. Liam Madden spoke out about this “war of aggression” in which war crimes were being committed, the Marines threatened him but again backed down when they saw organized opposition. The military now knows they will feel the wrath of the people if they threaten veterans who speak out against the occupation of Iraq.

The anti-war movement truly supported me in my case against the Air Force, which as a young African-American minister was so empowering to me personally that I pledge to increase my opposition to the U.S. occupation of Iraq. I pledge to continue my work in solidarity with the Iraqi people who are resisting U.S. occupation. I will not let the media spin that portrays all Iraqi resistors as insurgents linked to Al Qaeda and other terrorists groups, silence my moral support for the good people in Iraq who are fighting to free their land.

Indeed, I have just returned from a trip to the Middle East where I visited with Iraqi refugees. As a person of color, I have no issue with my brothers and sisters in Iraq. I also have no issue with the U.S. troops who serve with honorable intentions and so often join the military under the poverty draft. My issue is with the Bush Administration and our co-dependent Congress.

These are the six ways I see to oppose the U.S. occupation of Iraq: 1. Speaking out and creating an echo chamber of opposition; 2. Participating in acts of civil disobedience; 3. Joining the economic boycott led by the Iraq Moratorium beginning September 21st; 4. Casting your vote at the polls; 5. Giving direct aid to humanitarian programs for Iraqi refugees and internally displaced; and, 6. Counter-recruiting campaigns.

All these methods become effective when a critical mass of people is mobilized. The anti-war movement in the U.S. has yet to reach that critical mass. The critical mass that is necessary to have a real anti-war movement can be achieved by mobilizing those who are most oppressed by the U.S. government. We must link the struggles of the oppressed in the U.S. and in Iraq.

The displaced Katrina survivors and the displaced Iraqis is a good place to start. But it must go deeper than that. Literally, the money that was supposed to go to levees in New Orleans was diverted to the war in Afghanistan. The money that is being spent to kill Brown people in Baghdad is being diverted from programs that educate Black people in the U.S. For example, for what the State of North Carolina has sacrificed in war spending in Iraq, they could have provided nearly 600,000 students four-year scholarships at public universities.

I pray that our movement finds the strength of character to listen to the very oppressed for whom we claim to speak, and let the voices, ideas and actions of the oppressed drive a movement that can finally grow to that critical mass.

For Future Generations,
Rev. Lennox Yearwood, Jr.

Rev. Lennox Yearwood, Jr. is the President of the Hip Hop Caucus, www.hiphopcaucus.org. The Hip Hop Caucus is a national, nonprofit, non-partisan organization meant to inspire and motivate those of us born after the ’60s civil rights movement. Rev. Yearwood is also a member of Iraq Veterans Against the War, www.ivaw.org. Rev. Yearwood serves on the board of Voters For Peace, www.VotersForPeace.US.


(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. I.U. has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is I.U endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)

The Nazis, Fascists and Communists were political parties before they became enemies of liberty and mass murderers.