Junior Doesn't Give A Damn, My Dears

WASHINGTON: Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice urged the Democratic-controlled U.S. Congress not to interfere in the conduct of the Iraq war and suggested President George W. Bush would defy troop withdrawal legislation.

But Sen. Carl Levin, Democratic chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said lawmakers would step up efforts to force Bush to change course. "The president needs a check and a balance," said Levin.

Rice said Sunday that proposals being drafted by Senate Democrats to limit the war amounted to "the worst of micromanagement of military affairs." She said military leaders such as Gen. David Petraeus, the new U.S. commander in Iraq, believe Bush's plan to send more troops is necessary.

"I can't imagine a circumstance in which it's a good thing that their flexibility is constrained by people sitting here in Washington, sitting in the Congress," Rice said. She was asked in a broadcast interview whether Bush would feel bound by legislation seeking to withdraw combat troops within 120 days.

"The president is going to, as commander in chief, need to do what the country needs done," she said.

The Senate Democrats' legislation would try to limit the mission of U.S. troops in Iraq by revoking Congress' 2002 vote authorizing Bush's use of force against Saddam Hussein.
One draft version supported by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, also a Democrat, would pull out combat forces by March of next year and restrict U.S. troops to fighting al-Qaida terrorists, training the Iraqi security forces and maintaining Iraq's borders.

Democrats have acknowledged that the proposal does not yet have enough votes to overcome Republican procedural obstacles and a veto by Bush. But they are hoping the latest effort will draw enough Republican support to embarrass the president and keep the pressure on.
Levin said it was appropriate for lawmakers to limit the broad wording of the 2002 war resolution given how the situation in Iraq has deteriorated.

"This is not a surge so much as it is a plunge into Baghdad and into the middle of a civil war," he said. "We're trying to change the policy, and if someone wants to call that tying the hands instead of changing the policy, yeah the president needs a check and a balance."

Sensitive to wavering Republicans, Rice made clear that Bush had no intention of backing away from plans to send 21,500 more combat troops to Iraq. While the U.S. role has changed since its overthrow of Saddam, the United States is obligated to see the mission through by working to build a stable and democratic Iraq, she said.

Rice said it is impossible to distinguish what is going on in Iraq from the larger fight against al-Qaida.

"Some of these car bombs may indeed be the work of an organization like al-Qaida," she said of the violence that continues to rock Baghdad.

"I would hope that Congress would recognize that it's very important for them to have the oversight role," Rice said. "But when it comes to the execution of policy in the field, there has to be a clear relationship between the commander in chief and the commanders in the field."

Senate Republicans recently thwarted two Democratic attempts to pass a nonbinding resolution critical of Bush's troop plan.

In the House, a nonbinding anti-war measure was approved this month. Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat, has said she expects the next challenge might be to impose money restrictions and a requirement that the Pentagon adhere to strict readiness standards for troops heading to the war zone.

But that plan has drawn only lukewarm support from Democrats in the Senate and some in the House, who believe it is a politically risky strategy that could be seen as an unconstitutional micromanaging of a president's power to wage war.

"We're going to fund the troops as long as they're there," Levin said.

Rice appeared on "Fox News Sunday" and "This Week" on ABC. Levin was on "Meet the Press" on NBC.

(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. I.U. has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is I.U endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)

The Nazis, Fascists and Communists were political parties before they became enemies of liberty and mass murderers.

When Trust Is Gone......

With tensions at an all-time high, and volatility becoming a away of life, here and in the middle-east, trust in imperative.

There is no trust in this administration.

Can we risk two more years of this impasse?

RAMALLAH, West Bank, Jan. 14 — Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, pledging deeper engagement in the Middle East peace process, met Sunday with the Palestinian Authority president, Mahmoud Abbas, who rejected suggestions for establishing a temporary state within provisional borders and pledged that any American money to bolster his security forces would not be misused.

“I have heard loud and clear the call for deeper American engagement in these processes,” Ms. Rice said after two and a half hours of talks with Mr. Abbas.

“The United States is absolutely committed to helping to find a solution where Israelis and Palestinians can live in security, in which they can live in peace and in which they can live in democracy,” she said, adding, “You will have my commitment to do precisely that.”

Ms. Rice’s visit to the Palestinian government headquarters was clearly an effort to bolster Mr. Abbas in his struggle to regain the political advantage over Hamas, which took control of the parliament in recent elections.

But, likewise, the Israeli officials she is meeting during two days of shuttling between Israeli and Palestinian officials also are showing weakness in the polls. And Ms. Rice’s job of trying to accelerate progress on the “road map” — a step-by-step process for resolving the Israeli-Palestinian dispute — is overshadowed in the minds of many here by new Bush administration initiatives toward Iraq and Iran.

None of the parties to the talks here predicted any speedy breakthrough.

Although no formal proposal has been presented, some Israeli officials have floated the idea that the peace process could be accelerated by establishing a provisional Palestinian state within temporary borders to be subsequently set.

But Mr. Abbas said the idea would never work, fearing that the Palestinians might be locked into an inferior map.

“We have also noted to Minister Rice our decision to end any temporary or transitional solutions including a state with temporary borders because we do not believe it to be a realistic choice that can be built upon,” Mr. Abbas said during a joint news conference with the secretary of state.

Mr. Abbas also issued assurances that there would be careful spending and accounting of American money should Congress approve a State Department proposal for $86 million in “non-lethal assistance” to enhance those branches of the Palestinian security forces directly under his political wing — as opposed to those loyal to Hamas.

“Be confident that we will not misuse any aid that we receive from any party,” he said, noting that vehicles and communications equipment, as well as weapons, had been destroyed in clashes with the Israelis.

Late Sunday night, Israeli troops shot two Palestinians, detonating the explosives they were carrying as they approached the Gaza Strip’s border fence with Israel, the Israeli military said. Both Palestinians were killed, the military added.

The Rice-Abbas meeting was held in the Palestinian government compound in Ramallah, just across a cement lot where construction is under way on a mausoleum for Yasir Arafat, the deceased Palestinian leader. An artist’s rendering of the tomb and adjacent mosque captured an elegant, almost Frank Lloyd Wright combination of natural construction materials, simple angles and ornamental pools.

Last month, Israel’s prime minister, Ehud Olmert, met with Mr. Abbas and offered a number of concessions aimed at strengthening the Palestinian president’s position.

While Mr. Abbas said the session with the Israeli leader was “a good meeting,” he also said, delicately, that “we are waiting for the application of our agreements.” For her part, Ms. Rice had described the Israeli-Palestinian session as a reason for optimism.

But a spokesman for Mr. Abbas, Mohamed Edwan, gave a far more pessimistic review of talks between the Israeli and Palestinian leaders.

Mr. Edwan said that several agreements emerging from the Abbas-Olmert session, including a review of checkpoints and establishing a process for releasing prisoners, had languished, and he complained that a meeting that produced promises with no subsequent progress could only serve to weaken Mr. Abbas. It “hurts him rather than benefits him,” Mr. Edwan said.

Mr. Abbas’s rivals in Hamas offered even more negative assessments over all of the Rice visit and recent Israeli actions.

Ahmed Yousef, an adviser to Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniya of Hamas, said of Ms. Rice: “She said that she is here to listen, but the situation needs movement, not listening.”
Referring to previous pledges by Israel, he said, “What about Israel’s release of the money, the easing of movement, the removal of checkpoints?”

“Even on these issues, she hasn’t come with anything new,” Mr. Yousef said.

They included lifting restrictions on Palestinian movements and releasing $100 million in tax revenue that Israel collects on behalf of the Palestinians, but has been withholding since Hamas came to power.

In Jerusalem, where Israeli ministers gathered for the weekly Cabinet session, several expressed growing frustration at the continued Palestinian rocket fire coming out of the Gaza Strip.

“It is clear that sooner or later we will have to respond,” said Avigdor Lieberman, the minister of strategic affairs and an advocate of tough measures against the Palestinians.

While other ministers made similar statements, Meir Sheetrit, the housing and construction minister, said, “I don’t think it is possible that we should today have a massive action in Gaza.”
Despite a cease-fire in Gaza that came into effect on Nov. 26, Palestinian militants have continued to fire rockets into southern Israel on an almost daily basis. The rockets are inaccurate and rarely cause serious damage or casualties, but the Israeli government says it will not tolerate the attacks indefinitely.

Thom Shanker reported from Ramallah, and Greg Myre from Jerusalem.